Unlike the Gaga and Fox photos, pulled from a yearbook, the Kardashian photo is incredibly bad quality. It's really hard to tell it's her, although part of that might have had to do with the fact that, for 29-year-old Kim, the photo is over a decade old.
Then again, much of it probably has to do with the cosmetic surgery someone of Kim's wealth has surely had.
The photo of teenage-Kim is attached with a more recent photo, so the before-and-after is a little more apparent.
So, which do you think is better? Younger, short-haired Kim, or long-haired, potentially plastic surgeried Kim?